PLJ 2024 Lahore 214Present: Shahid Bilal Hassan, J.MUHAMMAD ADIL NAWAZ BHATTI--PetitionerversusCHAIRMAN UNION COUNCIL and others--RespondentsW.P. No. 62590 of 2023, heard on 30.1.2024.Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VIII of 1961)------Ss. 2(b) & 7--West Pakistan Rules under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, R. 3(b)--Three notices of talaq were served--Non-issuance of divorce...
The principle of welfare of a minor cannot be considered in absolute terms rather the same is a relative consideration and, at times, the same may have to be seen and considered through the prism of what is.....
The principle of welfare of a minor cannot be considered in absolute terms rather the same is a relative consideration and, at times, the same may have to be seen and considered through the prism of what is least detrimental for the minor, which implies that the Court may have to select a guardian out of the rival contestants who is least detrimental...
Polygamy---Contracting second Nikah during subsistence of marriage---Private complaint filed by first/existing wife--
2024 M L D 786[Lahore]Mst. SIDRA-TUL-MUNTAHA Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE Writ Petition No.84511 of 2023Polygamy---Contracting second Nikah during subsistence of marriage---Private complaint filed by first/existing wife---Ingredients of the alleged offence, non- existence of---Unlawful act and criminal intent---First/existing wife filed private complaint not only against her husband...
بچے کی ولدیت کے تعین کیلیے فریقین کی رضامندی کے بغیر ڈی این اے ٹیسٹ نہ کرایا جاسکتا ہے
Physiognomy, a best circumstantial evidence to assess paternity of a child.Consent of the parties is essential to decide claim of the parties with respect to paternity of the child. If the parties do not give consent for such DNA examination, then learned trial Court can draw adverse inference as per Article 129 (g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order,...
-Appeal, filing of---Condonation of delay----Maintenance allowance for minors, enhancement of--
2016 S C M R 1821[Supreme Court of Pakistan]Present: Iqbal Hameedur Rahman, Manzoor Ahmad Malik and Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, JJLt. Col. NASIR MALIK---PetitionerVersusADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and others---RespondentsCivil Petition No. 1428-L of 2016, decided on 14th July, 2016.(On appeal against the order dated 30-3-2016 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore, in W.P. No.7222 of 2016)(a) Limitation...
Ss.10 & 18---christian marriage Act (XV of 1872), S.4---Divorce, proof of---Jirga decision---Scope-......
2021 CLC 1761 ISLAMABADBookmark this Case Mst. SHAGZANA WALAYAT VS Mst. SHABANAM TABASSUMSs.10 & 18---christian marriage Act (XV of 1872), S.4---Divorce, proof of---Jirga decision---Scope---Respondent-plaintiff claimed pensionary benefits of her deceased husband and alleged that appellant-defendant was not legally wedded wife of deceased---Validity---To support validity of her marriage with...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
