“The definition of “actionable claim” in the TPA
is strictly and exclusively relatable to the
operative provisions of Chapter VIII of that Act,
which by virtue of Sections 130 to 137 thereof
inter alia, prescribes the requirements and the
broad mechanism for the transfer and the
assignment of the “actionable claims” so defined
in section 3. It has no application beyond the Act
even if any general...
Student/respondent in which he is studying and also considered the status of appellant
“- - - - - It is clear that at that time minor was of
about 8 years whereas, now he is 17 years old and
is getting education in high school in higher class.
Undoubtedly, now much more expenditures took
place than those were earlier. Although
respondent has submitted that he is a poor man
and cannot bear expenditures at the rate claimed
by respondent/minor in his plaint i.e. at the rate of
rupees...
Shia husband without reading “Segheas”
(2014 MLD 254), it was
held that the divorce pronounced by a Shia husband without
reading “Segheas” will not be effective against the wife.
Used in Judgment of:
WP- Family Law
26026...
No conflict between provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and provisions of Family Courts Act, 1964.
“Applicability of provision of C.P.C. in
proceedings before Family Court. Provisions of
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, would not be
applicable in stricto senso to proceedings before
Family Court; principles of Civil Procedure Code,
would, however, be attracted specially when there
was no conflict between provisions of Civil
Procedure Code, 1908 and provisions of Family
Courts Act, 1964.”
1999...
Leave the country of dispose of his property
“Application under O.XXXVIII, R.5, CPC could
only be granted when sufficient material was on
record that defendants were planning to leave the
country with a view to defeat the recovery of
plaintiff’s claim. No such circumstance existed in
the present case. Vague allegation about intentions
that defendant would leave the country were not
sufficient. Definite evidence was required to be led
before...
Suit for enhancement of maintenance
On the issue whether a suit for enhancement of
maintenance is maintainable under the Schedule, the
answer is that the same is maintainable. The Schedule
provides for the matter over which the family court
should have jurisdiction. Maintenance is provided at
serial No.3. As such there is no bar on filing a suit for
enhancement of maintenance. There are bound to be
changes in the circumstances and...
Trial Court and First Appellate Court are set aside
“After hearing the learned counsel for
both sides and taking into
consideration the fact that the
property was originally owned by the Panjnad Textile Mills, therefore, it
was incumbent upon the
plaintiff/petitioner to have impleaded
it as party and in absence of the
original owner decree passed shall
cause injustice to it and such order
would not be executable against a
person who was not a...
Family Court decreeing the suit
“Taking up the issue of dowry articles, again the
evidence of the appellant was neither contradicted
nor rebutted and the list of article as well as value
of the articles shown in it must be accepted on its
face value. Indeed reasons recorded by the trial
Court in this behalf do not appeal to mind and
assessment of value of the articles shown in it
must be accepted on its face value. Indeed reasons
recorded...
Recovery of dower amount.
(2001 SCMR 1323), it has
been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan
that where the husband participated in the proceedings
but did not file written statement as directed, the Family
Court is competent to strike off defence of the husband
and pass the decree for recovery of dower amount.
2016 LHC 3015
Writ Petition-Family-Dowry Articles
6867...
Fixation of an amount to be paid by the said organization to the minors
Abdul Majeed v. Additional District Judge,
Faisalabad and 4 others (PLD 2012 Lahore 445) seeks
indulgence of this Court for issuing direction to the
Government organization viz Bait-ul-Maal for fixation of an
amount to be paid by the said organization to the minors so as
to reduce his miseries and of the minors as well. Accordingly
with the assistance of learned Law Officer, the representative of...
Civil Procedure Code have been excluded by section 17 of the Family Court Act, 1964,
“The provisions of the Civil Procedure Code have
been excluded by section 17 of the Family Court Act,
1964, to proceedings under it. And it has been
consistently held that such provisions are not stricto
sensu applicable to the proceedings before the
Family Court. However, as the Family Court Act is
not an all-encompassing legislation and the
principles of certain provisions of the Code of Civil
Procedure...
Responsible for maintaining their grandchildren
“Although leave was not granted to examine this point we
permitted the learned counsel to advance the same so as to
clarify the legal position. No doubt grandparents, if
affluent, will be obliged to maintain grand children if they
are destitute. But the command would issue in this behalf
when there is no other nearer relation and/or more
responsible in this behalf. Accordingly, when a specific
proposition...
Delay, defeat or otherwise frustrate any decree that may be made in the suit
“The crucial element must be that the
concerned defendant intends to dispose of the
subject property with intent to delay, defeat
or otherwise frustrate any decree that may be
made in the suit. Clearly, such intent would
hardly ever been expressly spelt out and in
the normal course, must be gathered or
inferred from the relevant facts and
circumstances. The primary circumstance
relied upon by learned...
Consideration of welfare in determining the question of custody.
“The primary consideration for determining the question of
custody is always the welfare of the minor and there could not
be an absolute rule and fixed criteria to determine the question
of welfare in the same manner in each case rather it being a
mixed question of law and fact is decided in the facts of each
case and consequently the factors having only social
importance or the desirability of the...
Right of petitioner to interim relief
As the said Ordinance has taken away the right of
petitioner to interim relief, learned counsel
submitted that this was a ground which entitled the
petitioner to prosecute a writ petition despite the
pendency of the proceedings on the District Court.
The argument is misconceived because the writ
jurisdiction of the superior Courts cannot be invoked
in aid of injustice and in order to defeat the express
provisions...
Applicability of provision of C.P.C. in proceedings before Family Court
“Applicability of provision of C.P.C. in
proceedings before Family Court. Provisions of
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, would not be
applicable in stricto senso to proceedings before
Family Court; principles of Civil Procedure Code,
would, however, be attracted specially when there
was no conflict between provisions of Civil
Procedure Code, 1908 and provisions of Family
Courts Act, 1964.”
1999 CLC 81
PLD...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Powered by Blogger.