“The crucial element must be that the
concerned defendant intends to dispose of the
subject property with intent to delay, defeat
or otherwise frustrate any decree that may be
made in the suit. Clearly, such intent would
hardly ever been expressly spelt out and in
the normal course, must be gathered or
inferred from the relevant facts and
circumstances. The primary circumstance
relied upon by learned counsel for the
plaintiff in this regard was the alleged
disobedience of the interim orders made in
the litigation. However, after reviewing the
material and considering the interim orders
which have been placed on record, I am not
satisfied that such an intent can be clearly
spelt out.”
2012 MLD 171
PLD 2017 Lah. 689
0 comments:
Post a Comment