“However, where a dispute arises on this
issue between the parties as to the
payment/receipt/remission of dower then the
same would have to resolved by the Family Court. In this situation if the wife is willing
to deposit the dower amount in Court, then
too a preliminary decree for dissolution of
the marriage should be passed by the Family
Court whereafter the disputed issue
regarding the dower...
“certiorari” could only be issued,
“8 …in regard to finding of fact recorded
by the respondent writ of “certiorari” could
only be issued, if in recording such findings,
the respondent had acted on evidence which
was legally inadmissible or had refused to
accept admissible evidence or if the findings
were not supported by any evidence at all. If
in such cases error would amount to error of
law…”
2009 SCMR 210
Used In Judgment of:
Lahore...
Nikah Nama regarding payment of dower
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends
that receiving of the gold ornaments (worth
Rs.100,000/-) as dower was specifically denied by
the petitioner in paragraph No.4 of the plaint. The
entries in the Nikah Nama regarding payment of
dower were alleged to have been wrongly written
or tampered. Since the petitioner had denied
receiving of dower in the shape of gold ornaments,
therefore, family...
DNA profile test is always conducted
DNA profile test is always conducted with
the consent of the person concerned and is
normally applied in criminal cases as held by
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SALMAN AKRAM
RAJA and another vs. GOVERNMENT OF
PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, and others
[2013 SCMR 203]
Used in Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
25711-...
Misreading and non-reading of material evidence
“It is settled rule by now that interference in the
findings of facts concurrently arrived at by the courts
should not be lightly made, merely for the reason that
another conclusion shall be possibly drawn, on the
reappraisal of the evidence; rather interference is
restricted to the cases of misreading and non-reading
of material evidence which has bearing on the fate of
the case.”
2011
SCMR...
Summons for the appearance of witness, unless a party intimates
“The proviso of subsection (2) of the section 7 clearly
provide that the parties may with permission of the court call
any witness at any later stage if the Court considered such
evidence expedient in the interest of justice. Addition of word
“further” in proviso of section 7(2) by Ordinance VL of 2002
on 1-10-2002 manifest the intention of legislature to grant a
permission liberly, if, the Court...
Question of conducting the DNA Test.
[PLD 2010 Lahore 422], relevant
extract is re-produced below:-
“Now I would like to dilate upon the
question of conducting the DNA Test.
DNA Test is not to be directed as a
matter of routine in cases where the
father refuses to acknowledge his child
born during lawful wedlock, for the
reason that otherwise the presumption
under Articles 117, 118, 119 and 128
of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 that
a...
Withdrawn the notice of Talak within given time
In view of the above facts and the legal provisions, although
it was well within the rights of the petitioner to have withdrawn the
notice of Talak within given time (90 days), which he has failed to
do, because of which Talak became effective and irrevocable.
Reliance can be placed on M. Salahuddin Khan v. Muhammad
Nazir Siddiqi & others (1984 SCMR 583) and M. Zikria Khan v.
Aftab Ali Khan &...
Confronted with the provisions of section 7 and 11 of the Family Courts Act, 1964
“The provisions of subsection (2) specifically lay down that
the parties may, with the permission of the Court call any
witness at any later stage if the Court considers such expedient
in the interest of justice. By virtue of these provisions the Court
is competent to allow a party to include the name of desired
witness in the list in accordance with subsection (2) of section
7 (ibid). The witnesses...
Settled principle of law that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 212(3)
9. It is settled principle of law that constitutional
jurisdiction under Article 212(3) is discretionary in character. It
is settled law that grant of leave to appeal is discretionary. See
Ghulam Qadir Khan’s case (1986 SCMR 1386). It is also settled
law that constitutional jurisdiction against void order may be
refused if it was meant to enable petitioner to circumvent
provisions of law of limitation...
Delivery of dowry articles
(2008 SCMR
1584), it was held that delivery of dowry
articles should also be seen with reference to
the nature of the dowry articles whether they
are of personal use or otherwise. Applying
this principle statement of PW-1 showing the
normal useable articles do not appear to be
exaggerated.
Used in Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
21501-...
Divorce notice has to be sent by the husband
(2005 SLR 626),
in which it was held that the divorce notice has to be sent by
the husband to the union council where the wife resides but
nowhere it was held that in case of divorce by the wife she
must send a notice to a union council of her own residence.
Used In Judgment of
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
26026...
Not even the divorce document has been placed
“We notice that the learned counsel for the
petitioner has taken it as a ground for the first
time that the divorce pronounced orally in
October 1979 or in writing in January, 1980 was
such as to fall outside the provisions of sections 7
and 8 of the Family Laws Ordinance. Not even
the divorce document has been placed on record
to make out this ground. What we find is that the two courts dealing...
Oral Talaq would be effective and binding in spite
“In view of above position oral Talaq would be
effective and binding in spite of its noncompliance with mandatory requirement of
section 7 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance,
1961.”
PLD 2000 Quetta 46
Used in Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
3045...
Oral Talaq even if proved is invalid since no notice under section 7
“The objection of learned counsel for respondent
No.1 that oral Talaq even if proved is invalid
since no notice under section 7 of Muslim Family
Laws Ordinance, 1961 was given by respondent
No.1 to Chairman, Union Council or to the
petitioner is not sustainable. It has been held in
case titled Allah Dad v. Mukhtar and another
(1992 SCMR 1273) that failure to send notice to
Chairman, Union Council...
Talaq has become effective
“The question of the notice of Talaq to the
Chairman under section 7 of the Family Laws
Ordinance was also decided by all these Courts
in favour of the respondents and it was held that
even in the absence of such a notice, the Talaq
has become effective. Reliance, in this respect,
was placed on Article 2-A of the Constitution, as
interpreted in the case of Mirza Qamar Raza v.
Mst. Tahira Begum and...
‘Talaq’ cannot be subjected to the service of notice
“We have gone through the judgment in Mirza
Qamar Raza and appreciate that the
effectiveness of the ‘Talaq’ cannot be subjected
to the service of notice on the Chairman. The
observations of the learned Judge that the
reconciliation efforts ordained in Quran pertain
to a period before the pronouncement of ‘Talaq’
or that an official or other person cannot be
designated in a man-made law to enforce...
Heard.
“Heard. As regards the question, whether the
suit is competent before the Family Court, it is
the case of respondent No.1, and also held by the
learned Additional District Judge that the matter
falls within the Entry No.9 of the Schedule to
section 5, i.e. “personal property and belonging
of the wife”. I feel amazed to note as to how the
amount of Rs.100,000/- allegedly payable by the
petitioner...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Powered by Blogger.