[PLD 2010 Lahore 422], relevant
extract is re-produced below:-
“Now I would like to dilate upon the
question of conducting the DNA Test.
DNA Test is not to be directed as a
matter of routine in cases where the
father refuses to acknowledge his child
born during lawful wedlock, for the
reason that otherwise the presumption
under Articles 117, 118, 119 and 128
of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 that
a child born during the continuance of
a valid marriage and within two years
after its dissolution, provided the
mother remaining unmarried during
this period, shall be conclusive proof
that he is legitimate child of that man,
unless the man denies the same.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It has been observed by this Court that
it has become a common practice that
when the relationship between the
parties become strained after marriage
and even extreme hatred is developed
between the spouses and the same is
dissolved, the parties do not spare
each other and even go to this extent
that often father refuses to
acknowledge the child for the reason
either to evade maintenance or to
deprive the child from inheritance of in
case of his second marriage at the
insistence of his second wife or
pressure of the elders of the family
and this trend is not only damaging
but also very dangerous for the society
and in such a situation request for
DNA test is not proper.”
Used in Judgment of:
Used in Judgment of:
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
25711-13
25711-13
0 comments:
Post a Comment