Any illegality or error in the impugned judgments and decree passed by the Courts below

Since this is a case of concurrent findings and in the constitutional jurisdiction, it is mandatory for the petitioner to specify a jurisdictional defect or error with regard to the judgments of lower fora but the petitioner has failed to point out any illegality or error in the impugned judgments and decree passed by the Courts below. Hence, by relying upon the dictum laid down in “Waqar Haider Butt. Vs. Judge Family Court and others” (2009 SCMR 1234), the concurrent findings of fact settled by the Courts below, cannot be interfered by this Court. Thus, the same are maintained and upheld.

Used in Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Family-Maintenance
11306-15
2017 LHC 2850