“It is manifest from the perusal of above mentioned
provisions of law that action for recovery of decretal
amount can validly be taken against a surety of a
defaulter. The petitioner stood as a surety. He was under
no obligation to bind himself but he did bind himself to
pay the decretal amount, therefore, no interference is
required by this court in the impugned order passed by
the learned Civil Judge/Judge Family Court, as well as, in
order dated 11.10.,2011 passed by the learned Additional
District Judge, Sheikhupura.”
Used in Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Family-Miscellaneous
9483-17
2017 LHC 3061
0 comments:
Post a Comment