Yet, another aspect of the entry of column No. 16 is also
discussed in a recent judgment titled “Mst. MITHAN versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JATOI and 7 others” (2017 MLD
1101), where this Court in depth examined the validity of entry of
column No. 16 envisaged in the Nikah Nama. The observation
rendered by my learned brother is that after the insertion of item
No.10 of amendment of Schedule of Act XXXV of 1964, all the matters relating to the Nikah Nama can only be examined and
entertained by the Judge Family Court. Thus, it is settled that the
Family Court has the jurisdiction to entertain and decide the matters
arising out of Nikah Nama whether the same are mentioned as dower
or undertaking for the satisfaction of dower
Used in Judgment of
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Family-Maintenance
11306-15
2017 LHC 2850
0 comments:
Post a Comment