3. Learned counsel for petitioner argues that the impugned orders
passed by learned Judge Family Court, Multan are against law, facts
and liable to be set aside; that it has failed to be appreciated that
petitioner took stance in written statement that respondent No.3 and 4
were not born out of the marriage of petitioner with Mst. Shamim
Mai, respondent No.1 and to prove this fact, it was necessary to direct
for DNA test and also to summon the Doctor/Pathologist of Noor
Clinical Laboratory; that the impugned orders have been passed by
learned Judge Family Court, Multan merely on the ground that
petitioner had divorced respondent No.1 on 3.9.2012 and examination
was conducted after two years of divorce. He places reliance on the
judgments reported as “Mst. Shamshad Bibi v. Bushra Bibi and 3
others”(PLD 2009 Islamabad 11), “Naseer Ahmed v. Mst. Azrah
and another”(PLD 2010 Karachi 61).
Part Of Judgment
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition-Family-Miscellaneous
9730-15
2017 LHC 238
0 comments:
Post a Comment