The contention of the learned counsel for the
appellant that where appeal lies only against the
final order a Constitution petition challenging the
interim orders can yet be maintained is erroneous.
In the Lahore case PLD 1990 Lah. 352 relied upon
by the learned counsel for the appellant itself where
a final order was passed pending proceedings in the
Constitutional jurisdiction it was held that
jurisdiction stood barred final order having come in
the field.
It was further held:-
The statute excluding a right of appeal from the
interim order cannot be passed by bringing under
attack such interim orders in Constitutional
jurisdiction. The party affected has to wait till it
matures into a final order and then to attack it in the
proper exclusive forum created for the purpose of
examining such orders
1996 SCMR 1165
Used in Judgment of
Lahore High court
Case Law no.
| 2018 LHC 1173 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment