Record suggests that after giving six opportunities coupled
with cost and last warning, the petitioner has failed to file
written statement and also to pay costs vide order dated
26.11.2013. Keeping in view of above referred circumstances,
learned Judge Family Court while relying upon case law titled
“FAIZ-UL-HASSAN versus Mst. JAN SULTAN and 2 others” (2001 SCMR 1323) struck off the right of filing
written statement vide order dated 18.12.2013 and decreed
the suit vide ex-parte judgment dated 26.02.2014. Initially,
ex-parte decree was passed on 05.05.2011 which was set
aside on 26.11.2013. Inspite of numerous opportunities
petitioner had failed to file written statement, resultantly, his
right to file written statement was struck off as stated supra.
Thereafter, impugned judgment and decree was passed on
26.02.2014. Surprisingly, after passing of impugned ex-parte
judgment and decree, he remained mum and filed appeal on
28.03.2015, after delay of more than one year. It is well
settled principle by now that delay of each and every day has
to be explained as on account of limitation certain valuable
rights accrued in favour of other party. Record negates the
version of learned counsel for petitioner that due to death of
real brother of counsel for the petitioner, learned Judge
Family Court struck off the right of petitioner in hasty
manner.
Part Of Judgment
Lahore High Court
WP- Family Law
2280-16
2016 LHC 1487
0 comments:
Post a Comment