10. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that respondent
No. 3 was not entitled to recover the alleged amount of deferred
dower Rs. 2,00,000/- during the subsistence of marriage as deferred
dower becomes payable on dissolution of marriage either by death or
divorce and both the lower courts have committed illegality while
granting the said relief in favour of respondent No. 3. He has placed
reliance on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan reported as “Saadia Usman and another Vs. Muhammad Usman
Iqbal Jadoon and another” (2009 SCMR 1458), to contend that
deferred dower becomes payable on dissolution of marriage either by
death or divorce.
Part of Judgment :
LAHORE HIGH COURT MULTAN BENCH, MULTAN
WP- Family Law
11586-13
2015 LHC 3917
0 comments:
Post a Comment