6. So far as the objection of the learned
counsel that the learned Appellate Court has not
recorded issue wise findings as such its judgment is
not sustainable being violative of the provisions of
Order XLI Rule 31 of CPC is concerned, no doubt
the learned Appellate Court does not strictly
comply with the aforesaid provisions of law while
rendering impugned judgment but it is settled principle of law that if the Appellate Court decides
to affirm the findings of the learned Trial Court
then it would be sufficient compliance of the
provisions of law if the evidence is essentially
discussed and the findings recorded and mere nonadherence to the above provisions of law does not
make the judgment nullity in the eye of law.
Reliance is placed on case reported as Mst. Roshi
and others ..Vs.. Mst. Fateh and others (1982
SCMR 542).
Part of Judgment :
LAHORE HIGH COURT MULTAN BENCH, MULTAN
WP- Family Law
31094-14
31094-14
2014 LHC 11363 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment