In this regard I respectfully refer the case of Majid Khan v. Sessions Judge, Kasur and 5 others (2014 P.Cr.L.J. 903) wherein it has been observed as under:-
“Since nikah with the petitioner is admitted by Nadia Aslam, the alleged abductee by filing the suit for dissolution of marriage on 22.6.2012 and same belied the prosecution story as narrated in the F.I.R., she cannot be permitted to change her stance by making false statement to achieve nefarious goad. All this shows that she wants to make another statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. with some ulterior motive to entangle the petitioner in further litigation.”
Part of Judgment
LAHORE HIGH COURT RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI
WP- Criminal Proceeding27577-15
2015 LHC 6617
0 comments:
Post a Comment