It is settled law that in absence of a jurisdictional defect this Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction normally does not interfere in concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the learned Courts below unless a case of grave miscarriage of justice is made out.

12. Needless to add that it is a case of concurrent findings of fact. It is settled law that in absence of a jurisdictional defect this Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction normally does not interfere in concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the learned Courts below unless a case of grave miscarriage of justice is made out. Reliance is placed on the judgments reported as Waqar Haider Butt v. Judge, Family Court & others (2009 SCMR 1243), Shamshad Begum v. Mst. Huma Begum & others (2008 SCMR 79), Arshad Mehmood v. Additional District Judge, Rawalpindi & 5 others (2001 SCMR 516), Haji Abdullah & 10 others v. Yahya Bakhtiar (PLD 2001 S.C. 158) and Hanif & others v. Malik Ahmad Shah & another (2001 SCMR 577). 

Part of Judgment : 

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE
WP- Family Law
540-14
2014 LHC 11493

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

Case Law Search