2020 CLC 1178
Report of Finger Print Bureau clearly mentioned that Nikahnama did not bear the signatures of the respondent. Respondent in her plaint as well as evidence had categorically denied having entered into nikah with the petitioner and had stated that she was abducted and raped by the petitioner. Petitioner was required to prove the authenticity of the Nikahnama when the same was denied by the respondent. Petitioner himself had appeared in the witness box and had produced his real brother who was also an accused person in the crime. Sole testimony of petitioner's brother was not sufficient especially when the Nikah Registrar and other witnesses were not produced.
0 comments:
Post a Comment