Welfare of minors was the supreme consideration in cases of guardianship

Dictum laid down in 1997 MLD 965 reads as under: “Minor’s mother being employed as teacher in Education Department, in spite of her second marriage could took well after her children as compared to minors grand-paternal mother, grand-maternal mother and paternal aunt--- welfare of minors was the supreme consideration in cases of guardianship.” Part Judgment  of Lahore High Court Writ Petition-Family-Guardianship 5828-13 2017...

Petitioner never stood surety or guarantor on behalf of the judgment debtor

5. It is established from the record that the petitioner was not party in the suit. It is also established from bare perusal of the execution petition that the same was filed against Muhammad Nasir, judgment-writer. It is also established from the record that no decree has been passed against the petitioner. The petitioner never stood surety or guarantor on behalf of the judgment debtor. The petitioner...

Nikah Nama whether the same are mentioned as dower or undertaking for the satisfaction of dower

Yet, another aspect of the entry of column No. 16 is also discussed in a recent judgment titled “Mst. MITHAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JATOI and 7 others” (2017 MLD 1101), where this Court in depth examined the validity of entry of column No. 16 envisaged in the Nikah Nama. The observation rendered by my learned brother is that after the insertion of item No.10 of amendment of Schedule of...

Family Court empowered to strike off defendant's defence and pass ex parte decree

Reliance is placed on “Muhammad Tabish Naeem Khan v. Additional District Judge, Lahore and others” (2014 SCMR 1365), relevant portion is reproduced herein below:- “Family Court empowered to strike off defendant's defence and pass ex parte decree---Scope---Family Court was a quasi-judicial forum, which could draw and follow its own procedure, provided such procedure was not against the principles...

Section 14 of the Family Court Act provides that decision given under Family Court Act is appealable.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has vehemently opposed the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner mainly on the ground that Provisions of Guardian and Wards Act cannot be read in isolation and combined reading of Family Court Act will lead to a conclusion that in fact Section 14 of the Family Court Act provides that decision given under Family Court...

Extent of maintenance allowance

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset states that he do not challenge the validity of impugned judgment and decree to the extent of maintenance allowance as already expressed by him before this Court on 04.08.2017. However, he challenges the validity of impugned judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below to the extent of alternate value of dowry articles as well as dower in...

Any illegality or error in the impugned judgments and decree passed by the Courts below

Since this is a case of concurrent findings and in the constitutional jurisdiction, it is mandatory for the petitioner to specify a jurisdictional defect or error with regard to the judgments of lower fora but the petitioner has failed to point out any illegality or error in the impugned judgments and decree passed by the Courts below. Hence, by relying upon the dictum laid down in “Waqar Haider Butt. Vs....

Terms of Section 14(3) appeal before the learned District Judge

Learned counsel for the petitioner has mainly argued that in terms of Section 14(3) appeal before the learned District Judge was incompetent; therefore, impugned order is coram non judice, without jurisdiction In this regard, he has relied on “Mst. Sabira Sultana v. Asif Firdous” (2011 YLR 1543), “Shamim Ara v. Bakhtawar Gul and 2 others” (2012 CLC 1881). Learned counsel for the petitioner further...

Law that action for recovery of decretal amount

this the citation titled “AMANULLAH KHAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE and 3 others” (2012 CLC 679) has also discussed the supra situation which is as under: -  “It is manifest from the perusal of above mentioned provisions of law that action for recovery of decretal amount can validly be taken against a surety of a defaulter. The petitioner stood as a surety. He was under no obligation to bind himself...

Settled principle of interpretation of statues

8. It is settled principle of interpretation of statues that the statute which is later in time shall prevail. Reliance is placed on “Messrs Mehraj Flour Mills and others v. Provincial Government and others” (2001 SCMR 1806), “Suo Motu Case No.13 of 2007”(PLD 2009 SC 217) and “Aley Nabi and others v. Chairman, Sindh Labour Court and another”(1993 SCMR 328). Used in Judgment of Lahore High Court Writ...

CPC APP

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 And its Civil related Case Laws  For installation press link   https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nskcpccodeofcivilprocedure1908.nskcpc ...

Nikah can be entertain-able by the Judge Family Court?”

7. At the first instance with regard to issue of dower, it has to be examined that:- “Whether the entry of column No.16 of Purt Nikah can be entertain-able by the Judge Family Court?” The columns No. 13 to 16 of Nikah Nama, which relates to dower, shows that in these specific columns, anything mentioned therein is the dower or the part of dower. The specific question whether the entry of column...

Handing over custody of the minor during the summer vacations

12. So far as the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that family Court could not pass the order dated 25.06.2016 whereby application filed by respondent No.2 for handing over custody of the minor during the summer vacations was illegal on the ground that when the application already decided no fresh application could be entertained. In this regard, it is observed that the Guardian Judge...

Learned Guardian Judge/Judge Family Court under Section 12 of the Guardian

 learned Guardian Judge/Judge Family Court under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act was a decision or an interim order. This Court while confronted with the similar situation had already pronounced that such order falls within the purview of “decision given” and is appealable under Section 14 of Family Court Act. 1964. Reliance is placed on “Mst. Zaibun Nisa v. Muhammad Mozammil” (PLD...

Suit for maintenance under Section 17- B

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on “Mst. Sabira Sultana v. Asif Firdous” (2011 YLR 1453). This judgment does not relate to a case of Guardianship and is a dispute pertaining to maintainability of appeals against an order passed in a suit for maintenance under Section 17- B which was under discussion, therefore, this judgment is inapt Used in Judgment of Lahore High Court Writ...

Under Rule 5(6) of the West Pakistan Rules 1961

(PLD 1995 S.C. 633). He further submits that under Rule 5(6) of the West Pakistan Rules 1961 (Rules), all decisions of the Arbitration Council are taken by majority and where no decision could be taken with majority, the decision of the Chairman shall be the decision of Arbitration Council. He submits that in present case neither the majority decision was taken nor it is case of no decision by Members...

Option to appeal by virtue of section 14

"Now, I advert to the plea of learned counsel for the petitioner thut since the orders impugned heriin are of far rcuching consequences they can be challenged by means of a Constitutionul petition. .,Assuming for the sake of arguwent that -these orders would have lot of beating on the fate of the case, of the whole gamut of dispute between the parties. Final decision on the suit would be option...
Powered by Blogger.

Case Law Search